Movies' Modern Relevance- Rather, why they still have it.

We discussed recently in class the topic of movie theaters, and why they have stayed successful in America. One point that was brought up stuck with me, that being the pressure by society to see movies  as soon as possible. Most of the movie experience could be had in similar capacity with a dvd at home, Yet we still flock to theaters when the next Avengers or Star Wars comes out. This is because movies have endeavored to give us experiences that cannot be seen on tv. As a result, when we go to see them, we're often blown away by their quality and scale. We want to talk about them, but others don't want to have the movies spoiled. It plays on excitement and fear of ruining the story, which is why it's so effective at getting us into theaters time and again.

None of any Facts

While checking up on Satchel's charges into the project, I found a critique of a WDRB news story.
http://satchelsjcblog.blogspot.com/2018/10/all-facts.html
I think his points here are very valid- save his second paragraph opener. "Not only is this a meaningless, fear-mongering story..." is simply untrue. You argument point that there isn't enough information is valid and well put together, but works against you here. You show no evidence that this story tries to incite fear, and while extremely incomplete, this story is not meaningless. Even if this turned out to be a false alarm, it's helpful to know why police are blockading your apartment. There is meaning here, even if it is small and very localized. However, I agree that this story was in no condition to air. It is so incomplete that it is barely helpful to anyone watching the show.

A Serious Interlude- Hate Crimes, Ultranationalism, Gun Violence, and more.

The media has dubbed the last three days 72 Hours of Hell. During this time, we've seen 13 package bombs sent to various Democratic politicians, figureheads, and CNN. We've seen a hate crime- racially charged- occur within ten blocks of my house. We've seen a man walk into a place of worship in Pennsylvania and open fire. When we discussed these issues in class today, it certainly got me thinking. So I suppose I'll run down the list. I think all three of these attacks were hate crimes. There is no question to me that the synagogue attack and Kroger shooting were. I believe the bombs sent to  CNN and Democrats are also a hate crime. It shows such hatred of another's ideas that you are willing to kill them for their thoughts. After all, aren't politics and religion both ideas? These tie in to my next point of Ultranationalism. This ideology of violence is worryingly growing. Polarization of American politics is causing a sense of combat for power rather than cooperation for the good of the country.  Ultranationalism is dangerous to democracy. Defended and encouraged by a president who has condoned violence in the past, extremists are more willing to strike out. This point is tied to the next- Gun Violence. The man who attacked Kroger abused his wife, threatened to kill his family, had his guns taken multiple times, and yet was still given back his weapons. The man who attacked the Pittsburgh synagogue used the 1488 nationalist- white supremacist symbol and tweeted about HIAS- a Hebrew immigration foundation- bringing in 'invaders' , saying "I'm going in." The bomber had threatened to bomb a company before. Where do we draw the line on access to weapons? The point that regulating guns would be difficult is valid, but not insurmountable. It's clear to me that the synagogue shooter was dangerous and the Kroger shooter was at risk of snapping any second. We cannot have such a deep party divide if America is to survive.

IDOL-ized

Whilst perusing the archives of the J1 blogs, I happened upon this article by Desiree- http://lokiwasright.blogspot.com/2018/10/local-news-what-should-be-prioritized.html
I found it to be short but sweet. Desiree makes a legitimate argument, this being that celebrity tv (In this case, American Idol.) should not be placed more prominently than news stories affecting many across the nation. What stands in the way of political dominance if we allow news outlets to feed us entertainment instead of important, pertinent news about laws and freedoms of people nationwide? If we Idolize entertainment but stray from news, the consequences would be horrendous.

Update From the Warfront

Taking a brief break from my daily routine of slaying murderous greenskins to give an update on my progress. After the ambush in the woods, Corrowell fell. We raided the city by night, and then fought back the Ogre King's invasion force from the city of Peter's Keep. The generals let it go to their heads. We were ambushed again at the city gates, and lost several vehicles and thirty men. After some detours to deal with rogue goblins and lost Darkmen, we made our assault on the Greenskins' capital, Gubba's Town. We debuted Barracuda armor and Hammerhead mechs in combat this month. I need to get some sleep before we fight further into the city. Soldier out.

Response to Response to Trump: America's Last President?

Recently I happened upon a piece by Satchel on his blog here: http://satchelsjcblog.blogspot.com/2018/09/response-to-trump-americas-last.html
I agreed with most of the points Satchel made here. He was concise and backed himself up with evidence at most turns. There is however one small problem I noticed. That is this: Satchel repeatedly shows ridiculous quotes from the president, yet doesn't go on to discuss a clear problem with them beyond simply their message. This is the issue that the president is repeatedly lying to and deceiving the public- and getting away near scot free. However, overall Satchel did a grand job of debating points made in the article he critiqued, showing examples and text evidence to support his points.

Loki Was Good J+C

Recently, whilst browsing the J1 class' blogs, I stumbled upon a piece pertaining to mass communication by Desiree here: http://lokiwasright.blogspot.com/2018/09/mass-communication.html
I enjoyed perusing it. The article is not only informative, but, critically for my standards, entertaining. It debunks a myth about mass versus group communication, (This being that the number of the audience specifically matters in these comparisons.) It does this entertainingly by including intended revelations throughout the writing.